Creative Commons – The
Value and Risk of Flexible Copyright
You've worked hard to create your work, whether it's a black and
white photo or an abstract piece done with oil paints. And you want
to get it out there, maybe even online--showing your work, inviting
comment and feedback and selling a piece or two. Is there an easy
way to protect your work from being ripped of, while sharing it
at the same time? Yes.
Creative Commons is a type of licensing which promotes the creative
re-use of intellectual, creative and artistic works — whether
owned or delivered in the public domain. This licensing form is
a new alternative to traditional copyrights—a quick and free
middle ground between full copyright control and the unprotected
public domain.

Easing the Pain of Copyrighting
Artwork is automatically copyrighted at creation—it doesn’t
have to be registered. But without legal registration, proving copyright
can be a daunting issue. The issue is easily circumvented via Creative
Commons (CC), which gives artists a solution to protect and distribute
artwork without having to pay for an ‘official’ copyright
or affiliated legal fees. CC licenses provide a flexible and customizable
range of protections and freedoms for authors, photographers, visual
artists, performing artists and educators.
The free license legally defines the parameters of acceptable use
and distribution of an individual work or even a body of work. Licenses
are highly applicable to online work, or wares that appear to be
in the public domain. Consider your online image gallery or web-based
portfolio.
Do you want to encourage personal use but safeguard images from
commercial use?
Is your web site gallery openly shared to bring traffic to your
site?
Do you want to allow others to build upon your work?
Are you open to liberal use as a contributor to derivative works?
If you answered yes to any of the above questions, then CC may
be a good solution for you.
Six License Choices, Ranging from Very Restrictive to Very
Liberal
While there are six main licenses, we're going to keep our discussion
to the two on opposite ends of the spectrum--the 'free advertising'
license, which is the most restrictive, and the 'attribution' license,
which is the most liberal. You can see all six license options and
learn more at Creative
Commons.
‘Free Advertising’ is the goal of CC’s most
restrictive license, which allows limited distribution, mainly
as a way for you to advertise your own work. People can download
your work and share it, as long as they don’t change it
or use it for profit or commercially. You get advertising because
they must give you full credit for your art or photo, and include
a link to your web site.
‘Attribution’ licensing grants liberal use –
allows anyone to “distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon
your work, even commercially,” as long as you get credit
for the original artwork, image or body of work.
All licenses include CC’s “baseline
rights and restrictions.” Before applying a Creative Commons
license, it’s crucial to examine the baseline protections
along with the licensing language. And since your artwork is your
‘brand,’ it may be just as important to examine the
design and intent of the Creative Commons community at work. After
all, licensing integrates the Commons brand with yours.
Features & Benefits
How are artists and photographers using Creative Commons? And how
are they benefitting from the common community and culture?
- Check out this Creative Commons Art
Show launched by New York University Free Culture. CC affiliation
gave this group extended methods to publicize the show, and the
individual artists and their web sites--not to mention a built-in
network of supporters. Artists developed a meaningful message
related to their collaboration, the community and the art-appreciating
public.
- Boston’s Art
Remix was hosted by Harvard FreeCulture. Headlined “Sharing
is Daring,” the event promoted the most liberal use and
exchange of works allowing free reuse and remixing. “Why
is this important?” the collaborative asked. “Just
think: where would Disney be if there were no fairy tales? What
would our national anthem be if Francis "Sharedevil"
Scott Key hadn't ripped the melody off of an old British drinking
song?”
Whether you’re an artist looking for a quick alternative
to traditional copyright or a photographer intrigued by the thought
of promoting your work in an innovative manner, Creative Commons
has a flexible plan just for you.
Back to Article index
|